Did Apple disrupt the market? Did the launch of iPhone make Apple a market disruptor?
In the text below we are explaining the difference between two types of innovation; radical and disruptive, that often get used interchangeably, although they do have different meanings.
We have in previous articles mentioned different types of innovation and the reoccurring confusion between innovation and invention. Here we also briefly mentioned the concept of disruptive and radical innovation. Disruptive and radical innovation are, like innovation and invention, two terms that are often misunderstood and misused. They are often seen as synonyms when they in fact are descriptions of two different phenomena within innovation.
If you look it up, the word disruption is a synonym with words like disturbance, interference, and disarranging. While radical is a synonym with words like extreme, comprehensive, and thorough. These different synonyms of the words themselves, also reflect the difference between the terms in innovation theory.
What is disruptive innovation?
Disruptive innovation is often used to describe any situation that shake up the industry, and former successful incumbents stumble (Christensen, Raynor, & McDonald, 2015). But this description does not fully cover the spectrum of disruption and can relate to why disruptive and radical innovation often is seen as synonyms.
Disruptive innovation is looking at a situation where a smaller firm is able to challenge established incumbent businesses. This situation occurs as the incumbent businesses are too focused on improving their existing products and services, i.e. focuses too much on sustaining innovation, (Christensen, Raynor, & McDonald, 2015).
According to this definition, yes, Apple has disturbed the whole mobile phone industry when they launched iPhone.
Sustaining innovation “targets demanding high-end customers with better performance than what was previously available,” (Campbellsville University, 2017), which implies that a sustaining innovation does not create any new market, it rather focuses on creating incremental changes in the existing market.
As incumbent business focuses on these incremental changes, opportunities for smaller businesses arises. More specifically, as incumbents focuses on improving their existing products and services, they overlook lower-end segments, that then become available for smaller businesses to encounter (Christensen, Raynor, & McDonald, 2015).
According to these four characteristics, Apple is not a disruptor at all. Apple did not disturb the market by entering mobile phone industry through a low-end market. Additionally, iPhone does not offer functionality to a low price. iPhone was a superior product at the time of the launch and still is many years after.
Figure 1. Disruptive innovation
What is important to remember is that disruptive innovation is a process, and is represented by the evolution of a product or a service. This means that disruption is something that happens over time – a new innovation may thus in fact become a disruptive innovation even though it is not identified as one today. It is also important to note that it is not a requirement for disruptive innovation to be successful.
What is different with radical innovation?
What then is a radical innovation? A basic description of the term is that it is an innovation beyond our imagination, it is major. A more formal definition of the term describes radical innovation as something that “stem from the creation of new knowledge and the commercialization of completely novel ideas or products,” (Hopp, Antons, Kaminski, & Salge, 2018).
In difference to disruptive innovation, radical innovation has more focus on organizational behaviour and commercialization structures. In addition to this, radical innovation is usually a method for securing long term competitiveness and can thus be seen as the counterpart to incremental innovation (Hopp, Antons, Kaminski, & Salge, 2018).
Also, Apple is a good example of radical innovation.
Radical innovation may also include actions like displacing current products, coming up with new product categories, or altering customer-supplier relationships. The key difference is that a disruptive innovation is linked to the needs of customers, while a radical innovation is linked to capabilities within incumbents (Hopp, Antons, Kaminski, & Salge, 2018).
The difference between these terms is tightly knit to Christensen et al. (2015)’s requirements for a disruptive innovation to have taken place, which naturally should be read with a nuanced eye. It is though a key factor showing that disruptive and radical innovation is not necessarily the same thing. What is often confused between the two term is that a disruptive innovation is not necessarily a major change, which usually is the case in a radical innovation, i.e. a disruptive innovation can both be radical and incremental by its nature. Another important note is that radical innovation might just as well happen within an incumbent business without self-disruption having to take place.
Uber vs. Netflix
Trying to grasp what disruptive innovation really is, we can look at the case of Uber and Netflix, both of which typically is seen as disruptive innovations, when in fact only one of them is.
Uber is something many see as a disruptive innovation, when in fact their characteristics are more in line with a sustaining innovation and is thus not even seen to be radical. The reason for this is that Uber targets the existing market, or the existing customer base. It can also be argued that their service is even of a higher quality than the existing taxi service, with the ability to order and pay over apps, rate drivers, and even order exclusive cars for a cheaper price, which even was their launching service. It is thus a service that improves the existing taxi service, which is in line with the definition of sustaining innovation.
Netflix on the other hand initially offered a mail-order DVD subscription service that targeted those who did not care about hot new releases, while those that did care and wanted this on-demand did not find them attractive enough. Today, Netflix and similar streaming services have put any DVD rental service out of business, and can even be argued to challenge movie theatres. In other words, they were a small company against an incumbent, they targeted non-customers and created a new market, they offered lower quality to a cheaper price, and eventually, they moved up-market taking over also the high-level customers.
Understanding the difference between types of innovations are crucial when developing your own innovation strategy. This serves as an example, as the strategic actions needed to deal with radical innovations do not necessarily secure your company from disruptive innovations.
It is also important to remember that even though you might be facing disruption, do not forget your incremental innovations. To succeed, the combination of both exploring and exploiting is crucial.
You may be interested
Innovasjon. Innovasjon har blitt et buzz-ord i dagens næringsliv. Googles søkeresultater sier at ordet “innovasjon” har blitt brukt mer enn en halv milliard ganger på […]
In this article we look closer at: What the sustainability problem is, How does it impact your company, Two approaches to embrace the problem, 4 […]
It is easy to think that start-ups are only a small version of established companies, and the organizational structure is roughly the same only smaller. […]
In this article we look closer at: What does research say about sustainability and profitability? 3 easy steps to help you integrate sustainability efforts into […]
In most cases innovation does not come easy. Ideas about ways to innovate may be easily thought of, however, the right way of executing these […]
In this article we discuss: Does working from home damage innovation? How management needs to adapt? Possible solution: The actor-oriented structure Additional tips to succeeding […]
For at vi skal lykkes å nå målene om nullutslipp, må Norge dele kunnskapene internasjonalt.
EEA and Norway Grants? Ser du etter en norsk partner? Her er noen tips og triks fra vår erfaring i VINCO!
Digitalization is not the same as innovation, but digitalization can be an important factor that will inflame innovation. Many innovations resulted from digitalization through enabling […]
Design thinking and culture
Å fremme innovasjon er nøkkelen til å utvide virksomheten din og nødvendig for å holde deg foran konkurransen. De to sektorene som brukte mest på […]
Did Apple disrupt the market? Did the launch of iPhone make Apple a market disruptor?
3 important tips you can learn from the Covid-19 crisis to excel in your innovation endeavors!
Tjener alle innovasjonsløsningene dine penger? Her er 3 trinn for hvordan du oppretter en bærekraftig innovasjonsportefølje!
Vil du ha en portefølje av innovative løsninger som ikke tjener penger?
In this post we cover: What is in common among persistent innovators during and after the 2008 crisis? How will the Covid-19 crisis affect […]
How can we expect that the (coronavirus) crisis will affect innovation output?
Innovation is a very frequently used term. Everyone talks about innovation. We hear phrases like disruptive innovation, incremental innovation, architectural innovation, radical innovation… But how […]
In less than three months, the spreading of the coronavirus has proven to be catastrophic for hundreds of thousands of people. At the time of […]
Coronavirus (or Covid-19) has caused the world to turn upside down in a very short time. As of last week, the picture in Norway has […]
SSB sin statistikk viser at i Norge var det ca. 65% av norske foretak som hadde noen type av innovasjonsaktivitet i perioden 2014-2016. Dette er […]
BT har skrevet et innlegg om Bergen Kommune (BK) sitt initiativ «Digital Kultur Plattform». Jeg har ledet forprosjektet (gjennom engasjement i Capgemini) i vår og […]
The city of Bergen invited Michela Magas for visit in May as a part of the Festspillene[i] and launching of the Bergen Nå(Now) project. I […]